View Single Post
Old 01-17-2009, 11:26 AM   #26
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalmations202 View Post
As I have said before. I do not care about salaries. Mark can overpay or underpay -- as long as he puts a viable team that competes for the championship every year ---- I am happy.

This team right now will not contend. With this trade, (at this time), they still will not contend.

There needs to be a bigger splash coming.
I get that, but the Mavs' salary commitments have a directo impact on their chance to compete long term.

This move, indirectly, helps the Masvs win in the long term, *if* they use the saved money properly.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote