View Single Post
Old 01-21-2009, 06:06 PM   #11
Robillion
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,650
Robillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant futureRobillion has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkFTW View Post
This "equal opportunities for all irrespective of religious beliefs" talk seems surprisingly absent when it is:

County clerks who refuse to provide marriage certificates to homosexuals
Pharmacists who refuse to provide morning-after pills
Doctors/Hospitals who refuse to conduct or recommend abortions

Just saying that what's good for the goose should be good for the gander.
Not necessarily...

That may fall in line with your first example, as if county clerks provide marriage certificates to straight couples, then yes it would be discrimination to homosexuals for them to not also provide one to them. But, the other two examples are of businesses that have decided not to provide a particular service to anyone. Not just homosexuals. Businesses should have the right to withhold their own services, but not be inclusive and exclusive to who they offer them to based off of race, color, gender, creed, or sex.
Robillion is offline   Reply With Quote