View Single Post
Old 01-31-2009, 09:37 AM   #32
alexamenos
Diamond Member
 
alexamenos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Basketball fan nirvana
Posts: 5,625
alexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalmations202 View Post
Right now, people are taxed every year on the land they bought (continual taxation) -- but their is no tax or penalty for the ones who make the most money off them by keeping the mineral rights for years -- even when they sell the land. Then because they own the mineral rights, they have all the rights of what to do on the surface land -- and only have to pay a smidgen of the property value loss when they do.

First tax I would have --- tax the oil companies and people who have mineral rights separated from the land. Landholders get taxed for mineral rights with the land.
FYI -- mineral rights are already taxed (heavily) in the state of Texas. Oil companies and royalty interest owners pay taxes on their minerals the same way home owners pay taxes on the value of their homes. In most other states, oil companies pay a severance fee on oil and gas production to the state long before they pay income taxes (or not) to the fed gov.
__________________
"It does not take a brain seargant to know the reason this team struggles." -- dmack24

Last edited by alexamenos; 01-31-2009 at 09:38 AM.
alexamenos is offline   Reply With Quote