Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog
no, you still choose to avoid the question.
are you honestly saying you prefer leadership to have a closed, inflexible policy? do you actually not desire leadership to work with various groups to forge a consenus, but rather exhibit a rigidity of closedminded positions?
I don't. I want leadership that can move forward by bridging differences and finding ways to reach a positive, mutually acceptable result. flexibility is a strength, not a weakness.
it's all about results, not who wins and who loses.
at least to some of us.
|
if you are wrong, then there is no compromise and middle ground. Halfway between wrong and right is not generally acceptable.
You can't negotiate a middle ground with Iran's policy on Israel. You can't negotiate a middle ground between Obama's socialism and the tradition of capitalism. They are ideas in opposition.