Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bDad
For the most part, I actually agree with Mavdog!!!
Rather than focusing on who, perhaps discussing the issues and how the issues should be governed will better help define who the candidates should be in 2010, 2012 and beyond.
We see the failure that is, pushing Obama sooo early, only to win the Presidency with no experience...perhaps we can move forward and focus on the issues themselves and then line up EXPERIENCED candidates with track records that show them VOTING on existing issues, so that we know how they will govern after the campaing rhetoric has passed.
|
No person gets scrutinized more for VOTING on existing issues than sitting senators. That's why they so rarely win. A governor doesn't ever really have to deal with that, because he's able to focus on a few issues and is never forced to show his hand on other things.
And of course, lol at "failure" 2 1/2 months in.