Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Usually Lurkin
her presence there, as moderator, is unfair. Whether she acts objectively or not. Rush Limbaugh could probably do a great job being objective, Bill Clinton probably would, too. but there's a reason they'd be a crappy choice for moderator of a debate like this.
|
if the moderator acts like a moderator should, acts "objectively", it's somehow "unfair"?
why, will palin not be able to concentrate because ifill is there? will her mere presence cause palin's attention span to be shortened? will ifill's voice trigger some sort of short circuit in palin's mind, rendering her unable to use her motor skills to speak? will ifill be like some sort of krptonite and make all of palin's abilities useless?
or will biden become somehow strengthened in his reasoning? will ifill power biden with an energy by osmosis? perhaps ifill will be capable of transmitting her questions to biden vis telepathic means before they are actually spoken?
should ifill continue to perform her job as well as she has throughout her well regarded career, there is no issue. none at all.
"unfair". too funny.