Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog
are you suggesting a position asking for more enforcement is equatable to those who argue for no enforcement? really?
|
I'm saying that a no vote was a vote for the benefit of military contractors, and the excuses were filled in afterward.
Here's from the office of one republican:
"Unfortunately, the Franken amendment would not do anything to protect women from violence or to punish criminals. If it had, Senator Burr would certainly have voted for the amendment."
If you interpret the spin only to the benefit of your own party, how can you complain about partisanship?