View Single Post
Old 01-02-2012, 04:30 AM   #12
dirno2000
Diamond Member
 
dirno2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Robot Hell, NJ
Posts: 9,574
dirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond reputedirno2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chumdawg View Post
I agree with you wholeheartedly. But that still doesn't explain why college programs aren't turning them out. Safety has been a really weak class in the draft the last couple years. It's not like we are talking about fullback, which many teams don't have a lot of need for. Every defense has a need for safeties.
That's a good question, especially in light of the fact that most of the offenses in college football run passing based attacks. Could be what Alby said. On average there are a couple of really good quarterbacks that come out of college every year. Safety may not be far off from that number.

Of course this is not a perfect example since safeties don't typically regress like you see some quarterbacks do (Freeman and Sanchez come to mind). You would think there would be more dominant players.
__________________
dirno2000 is offline   Reply With Quote