View Single Post
Old 12-27-2007, 07:22 PM   #512
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Boy Laroux
wouldn't that be counter-intuitive? by giving in and allowing other networks to show the game, that just tells the cable subscribers that their cable company isn't doing anything wrong. the NFL is going to give them the games they want to see.

Now, if the NFL had stuck to its guns and only aired it on the NFL network, then that would anger fans towards their cable companies.

but i do see how fans could misplace their anger, and direct it at the NFL instead.
I think with the criticism they've been receiving over their game presentation, they felt like this could turn the wrong direction for them if a lot of people didn't get to see this game.

I personally think it's going to backfire, because Gumbel is just that terrible. People are going to understand why the cable companies are taking their position.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote