View Single Post
Old 10-01-2010, 05:20 PM   #15
Kidd Karma
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,855
Kidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant futureKidd Karma has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007 View Post
Idk, I think his problem is getting them in the games and learning as they go. The problem I had with him is the minutes for the young guys. At some point they have to learn it and hold themselves accountable, but to do that he has to play them. He is just trying to slow down the "Roddy is the 2nd option, starting PG, right answer at SG, carry us to a championship" hopes.
Yea, I think Carlisle can't stand rookie mistakes, but he will get a sick Jason Kidd in the playoffs. When youi're tired your immune is down, does playing Kidd 32 guarantee he's not sick in the playoffs, no, but chances are better that he doesn't get sick. You have to trust your players, mistakes will happen, Tony Parker, Rajon Rondo are some of the stars who learned on the big stage. This team will win 55 games no matter what, getting Roddy PT will get you another round in the playoffs. You learn from mistakes, you only get so much from soneone in your ear, you have to go out and learn those mistakes. A mistake here or there, will not cost you a game, with the vets we surround them with. Would you run Dojo and Roddy out there at the same time? Not likely, but staggering their minutes with Kidd/Jet would do wonders for us and them in the playoffs. Carlisle doesn't see it and guess won't get it. Still going with the idea of no roles, and the players playing best will fill roles we need, game to game. This is not what a vet team needs, you look at the Lakers-Celtics they both have youngsters filling roles.
Kidd Karma is offline   Reply With Quote