View Single Post
Old 01-21-2011, 07:01 PM   #69
AngieO41
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 415
AngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to beholdAngieO41 is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bernardos70 View Post
And we can trust those guns owned by those 1000-to-1 responsible owners to remain in their possession all the time, not go off by accident, etc. There's nothing wrong with more restrictive gun laws. But it isn't as easy as some think to judge who is fit to own one or not. Or train them. I think gun ownership should come with training and evaluation similar to getting a driver's license, and with it should carry equivalent training, etc.

We're talking about a tool which has the purpose of killing/injurying people. It should be taken seriously.


B, we should just give up. The people who don't want restrictive gun laws are the same people who seem to think it's ok to go through the ringer before getting on a plane cause ya know, terrorists might do something! GASP! Make sense to you? Yeah me neither.

Tell me, how many times have we been affected by psycho's on a plane? How many times have we been affected with psycho's from a gun? Thank you.
AngieO41 is offline   Reply With Quote