it is interesting to read how in some eyes hillary is "ruthless, unapologetic, unshameable", that she is "a bought and sold politician", and even a "socialist lesbian lizard queen".
quite an assortment of negative stereotypes...
tell me, how is it that hillary is more "ruthless" than say McCain, or Brownback, or Guilani, or Edwards?
is she more "unapologetic" than Hunter? Brownback?
is she more of a "bought and sold politician" than her contemporaries mentioned above or others who have thrown their hat into the ring?
and what in her actions leads anyone to believe that she is not only a "socialist" but also a "lesbian"? should we hurl invective at all the men in the race for possibly being gay? after all apparently having a marriage and giving birth to a daughter doesn't preclude her from being a homosexual so why should we presume any of the men in the race who are married are not homosexual as well?
I'd suggest that hillary be treated no different than the male candidates whom she is facing in the race. the fact that she is a women shouldn't lead her to be called a "bitch" merely because she is aggresive, as we don't call a male politican a "bastard" merely due to their showing themselves to be aggressive like she is. I'd refrain in calling her a "lesbian" just like we typically don't call her competition "homos" if they show themselves to be sensitive men.
equal opportunity. equal treatment.
|