Thread: Ka-BOOM!
View Single Post
Old 02-03-2006, 11:47 PM   #59
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude1394
Okay did some looking around to try and understand the constant statements of anti-bush types everytime the unemployment rate goes down. We get the same story that we are still in depression and the only reason the employment rate is going down is because people are leaving the workforce.

Econopundit addresses this. I do not pretend to understand this all.

Caption: While driving back to the office I heard some NPR expert explaining why the current employment figures only look good because so many job seekers have gotten discouraged and dropped out of the labor market.

Here's BLS series LNS13327707, seasonally adjusted total unemployed plus discouraged workers as a percent of civilian labor force plus discouraged workers. Don't be confused here. This is what the unemployment rate would look like if we included discouraged workers in the calculation:

I guess I could be missing something, but the BLS inclusive-of-discourage-worker-effect seems to be going down, not up.
I'll look at the numbers with that set of assumptions and respond, but off the cuff the graph doesn't appear to match the fact that there are more workers not in the labor pool today than when the peak is shown in this graph (est. 3Q 2003).
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote