Thread: DOJ...what's wrong with showing proof?
View Single Post
Old 06-03-2009, 01:10 PM   #29
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bDad View Post
Mavdog,

I suppose the issue is that a fairly significant number of citizens are indeed concerned with 'Voter Fraud'

As a result, it would be fair to say that eligible voters are disenfranchised with the system and potentially don't vote as they believe it will not matter.

Thus there is a perception of fraud and utlimately a fairly simple solution which can be implemented relatively easily.

I believe several understand the issue of mobility challenged individuals and that most are willing to find a solution for those individuals.

There is a view that the system is broken, so why not provide a solution that creates more confidence in the system, rather than leaving things as they are?

that's ridiculous.

does the incidence of paranoia mean that someone is truly in danger?
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote