View Single Post
Old 03-20-2014, 10:15 AM   #12
mcsluggo
Golden Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 1,970
mcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan View Post
It's a net negative. Who cares if GDP shows up somewhere, overall prosperity went down.

But then, Keynesian economics doesn't care about prosperity, it cares about "spending". Or sorry, "moving funds".
congratulations on completely missing a simple point, and then tossing in a useless canned platitude as a delicious cherry topping.
mcsluggo is offline   Reply With Quote