View Single Post
Old 09-01-2004, 04:55 PM   #38
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:Alan Keys calls Cheaney's daughter a Sinner

Quote:
Originally posted by: Mavdog
Quote:
Originally posted by: kg_veteran
In other words, you only tolerate beliefs that you find tolerable, right?
so you advocate tolerating actions of hate? you would tolerate discrimination against people?
You yourself said that you would call people "selfish hedonists". Since this term is your only basis for concluding that Keyes hates and discriminates, we must conclude that you would not only tolerate actions of hate and discrimination, but that (just like Keyes) you would by use of the term be a proponent of hate and discrimination.

Since you would also promote views of hate and discrimination (by terms you describe as applicaple according to your humble opinion), you can only be in disagreement with Keyes about the source of his opinion - what you assume are religious views.

You are intolerable of Keyes' opinion not because of the hate and discrimination that you assume are there (you also must espouse such views), but because of what you assume is his religion.

edit for conclusion:
if Keyes is a sexual bigot, then you, Mavdog are a religious bigot.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote