Thread: Dfs / bullock and thj need go
View Single Post
Old 11-09-2022, 12:27 PM   #17
dirt_dobber
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Posts: 3,238
dirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond reputedirt_dobber has a reputation beyond repute
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man View Post
Throughout their history, the Mavs have had stellar offence and mediocre defense, often because management prefers flashing scorers over gritty defenders. Our new management values defenders more, and I am glad for it. there is no WCF without Bullock.

Dumping him is not as dumb as getting rid of Tyson Chandler. But is the same type of dumb move. Defenders who are also scorers are rare and expensive. The Mavs don't have a problem getting enough points. They have a problem holding leads, and without Bullock, that stat would be much worse.
G-Man and EL are right - If we traded Bull the only lock down defender we have is Dodo and he was getting gassed when all we had was him. I would however rotate him out a few minutes here and there. Maybe only 10% less.
dirt_dobber is offline   Reply With Quote