View Single Post
Old 04-27-2008, 09:33 PM   #101
wmbwinn
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,043
wmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud of
Default

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9056589?source=rss

It appears that all they have found is 20 women who have had children at an age that constitutes statutory rape. That includes women currently in their 30's and 40's where the math shows that their first child/pregnancy was at a young age.

So, how many of those roughly 470 children are the result of statutory rape (I won't call it polygamy because they aren't married and if we call it polygamy then every man with children from two women that he had a concurrent affair with is a polygamist)?

So, what is the logic legally to seize all the children?

Again, the logic is that the whole group is guilty by culture and religion of setting an environment where maladaptive children MIGHT occur.

Again, that means to be consistent, CPS will need to invade a high percentage of America and take their children for reasons that I have listed before. The legal precedent here is very dangerous...
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson
wmbwinn is offline   Reply With Quote