I find it very interesting that all the talk in the media seems focused around the underaged girls who are "spiritually married" to older men, and yet nobody seems to care about the identities of the men who have impregnated them (or should I say "raped" them as wmbwinn points out). I suppose the court's mandated DNA testing will ID the fathers, but that's only if they have the corresponding male specimens for comparison. And given all the hoopla over this, the men have had plenty of time to flee the state, if they so choose.
|