View Single Post
Old 05-29-2008, 08:56 PM   #209
dude1394
Guru
 
dude1394's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 40,410
dude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmbwinn
There is already a law against a man having sex with a 14 year old girl. It is the statutory rape law. There is already a law against a man having a 14 year old "spiritual wife". It is the statutory rape law. The "spiritual wife" is not a legally married wife and so the statutory rape law applies since they are not legally married.

So, what law did you want to change?
Hey now...If they are both in agreeance, what's the diff? I mean why shouldn't they be allowed to marry, everyone else seems to think they can, in fact it's now become a "right" to marry anyone and anything.

What's an arbitrary 14year age limit when there are civil rights at stake?
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’

Last edited by dude1394; 05-29-2008 at 08:57 PM.
dude1394 is offline   Reply With Quote