View Single Post
Old 06-24-2009, 01:40 PM   #11
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog View Post
what exactly is the "larger point"? is it that the united states must jail every religious extremist encountered?

after all, the person you reference has not broken any us law. he did not attack us, as far as we know he has not attacked any amercans....he has not been tried nor convicted of any criminal act.

should we preemptively jail anybody who might act in the future?

no, I do not believe we should.
well, that's certainly better than the nanny-nanny boo-boo trolling.

I think he was originally captured because someone thought that he'd trained in a terrorist camp, and that he was helping to fund and transport terrorists.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote