View Single Post
Old 04-17-2008, 11:37 AM   #43
DirkFTW
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,249
DirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexamenos
Anyone out there who maybe surprised that the State of Texas is dismissing the importance of "Sarah" is woefully ignorant with regards to the workings of government agencies. Like pool chalk planted on an alleged crack dealer, this was an extraordinarily forseeable occurence.

This was a pretext from the beginning--a false reason for raiding a religious sect. As such it is a gross violation of the 4th amendment rights of citizens of these United States.
I don't pretend to know their motives, but it doesn't seem bad for the state to intervene if they really can prove all the removal cases without the original case. The original case, regardless of the final charges, provides grounds for the state to be there. In the process, they see other things that need to be addressed separately. You can't expect the cops/CPS to show up in blindfolds, asking to be taken to the caller's home just so that they have a narrowly-tailored presence... or worse to ignore what they see because that's not the reason they are there.
__________________


Is this ghost ball??
DirkFTW is offline   Reply With Quote