Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DirkFTW
I don't pretend to know their motives, but it doesn't seem bad for the state to intervene if they really can prove all the removal cases without the original case. The original case, regardless of the final charges, provides grounds for the state to be there. In the process, they see other things that need to be addressed separately. You can't expect the cops/CPS to show up in blindfolds, asking to be taken to the caller's home just so that they have a narrowly-tailored presence... or worse to ignore what they see because that's not the reason they are there.
|
Regarding the bolded: No.
The concern is that the original call was not only a sham, but it was a sham engineered by the local governmental officials, to serve as a pretext for going in and confiscating the children; that it was a sham, and that the State KNEW it was a sham.
That type of behavior and complicity by the State is at least as troubling as the yet unproven allegations of sexual abuse.