View Single Post
Old 08-21-2009, 10:45 AM   #59
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kg_veteran View Post
Exactly. Welfare isn't what insurance companies do.
right, and that is why insurers aren't "socialist welfare schemes".

Quote:
BTW, Mavdog, if you think that insurance companies are going to operate at a loss just because the government tells them that they can't deny anyone coverage, I think you're in for a rude awakening. The reality is that if you mandate coverage for everyone, for everything, you're going to eventually run all the private insurers out of the market.

And then you'll have the single-payer system.
and if they operate with a profit because they correctly approximate their losses with appropriate premiums, the population will be better off, the industry will be better off, and the government won't be in the insurance business.

the risk associated with pool of insured won't materially change, and the actuarial tables will be valid and reliable.

and just like we have now, there will be competition in the marketplace.

Last edited by Mavdog; 08-21-2009 at 10:46 AM.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote