View Single Post
Old 12-09-2004, 05:43 PM   #20
Murphy3
Guru
 
Murphy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sport
Posts: 39,425
Murphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:Addressing some common fallacies concerning Dirk

Quote:
Yes Nellie went back to an PUBLICIZED use of an old tool he used in prior years, the point forward. But with a need to get rebounders on the floor, he knew that Walker could help in that area. And he appeared to have ball handling skills. Furthermore, when Walker is added at the last minute, and Dirk and Walker play the same position, how does he paint things in a way that might get both players enthusiastic? He did what needed to be done, as I saw things.
This is absolutely brilliant. He did what needed to be done as you saw things? Well, apparently you saw things in the same warped way in which Nellie saw things. Can you justify making Walker as much or more of an offensive focus as Dirk? How can you? Yes, getting more rebounders on the floor is important, but that's not really addressing much of the offensive issues is it? Does getting more rebounders on the court have much to do with the offense running through Walker? Does getting more rebounders on the court have a damn thing to do with Walker averaging more FGA's and getting more touches through much of the first half of the season? No, of course not.

Everyone has admitted to this error, but you continue to contend that it was the right thing to do. How?
Murphy3 is offline   Reply With Quote