View Single Post
Old 08-26-2009, 09:22 PM   #95
aquaadverse
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 317
aquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
no, you're wrong. the staff is full of people who have worked in washington for yuears. rice, summers, nicolson,moran, orszag, craig, podesta, messina....
None of them are close advisers. Whoever is advising him is doing a poor job.

Quote:
??? presidential pardons? uh, come back to earth will ya?
Holder was the one carrying that to Clinton. It speaks to your "simply a case of right and wrong", presumably without being tainted by politics. He was the deputy AG. Apparently climbing a ring higher is purifying.

Quote:
you have a fascination of comparing obama to carter. time will tell, but so far there's really not an accurate analogy.
It's apt. Except Carter took longer to have people back off because they were worried about being reelected. From a direct comparison standpoint it would be closer to Clinton's term. Health Care, passing spending bills with no Republican votes.

The big difference and the reason I use Carter is Clinton would make a mistake and learn from it. All of them have superior intellects but Carter and Obama are more ideologically driven and have a problem predicting the results of their actions accurately. Clinton would never ask for his entire cabinet to tender their resignations and he wouldn't have been dismissive and tried to marginalize protesters. I haven't heard a President directly spend so much verbage about the media like Obama has since Nixon.

Last edited by aquaadverse; 08-26-2009 at 09:26 PM.
aquaadverse is offline   Reply With Quote