Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack.Kerr
Do you, in fact, understand the difference between a 'sunk cost' and a 'distressed asset'?
|
I'm certainly open to a new perspective on this, but I think sunk cost fits better where the Mavs stand. We are not getting value paid on this guy and the vibe to me is they aren't willing to let him go for much less. We don't need immediate influx for him so we're just sitting on it hoping he increases his value to better justify what we spent and at that point unless it's still not a great fit here, then we get much more for him.