View Single Post
Old 08-12-2008, 12:11 AM   #55
chumdawg
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
chumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Why do we need to reinvent the wheel? Why not the Yahoo! standard: QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, W/R, TE, K, DEF? We can throw in the second QB starter and not have it impact the size of the bench (trust me, you aren't going to want to carry the 25th best QB on your bench). Just the same, we can start two kickers and two defenses if you like. But when we start four or five WR's and three or four RB's, we are basically deciding the games before we play them.

We need a good flux of movement at the WR and the RB.

And I still say, the W/T position is the most insidious thing I've ever seen. There is absolutely no reason for it.
chumdawg is offline   Reply With Quote