Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fidel
now you´re just talking like a hater. i get that you´re a federer lover, and he is a great player no doubt. but you are either blinded by your hate for nadal, or you just don´t know tennis so well. otherwise you´d give nadal more credit than you do. he had roddick and robredo in his quarter of the draw and davydenko, youzhny, murray, gasquet in his half of the draw. it´s not his fault they all lost early. actually it wouldn´t have mattered though as nadal can beat anybody on the tour and has positive head to heads against allmost all players. also he´ll reach alot more semi finals at the US and Australian. you were just way way off with your assumption he´d "never" do it.
as far as the winner of federer-djokovic "destroying" nadal. well this is just laughable. it "could" happen, you never know in tennis. but the odds are definitly against it. nadal leads the head to head against djokovic 6-2 (2-2 on hard) and 8-6 against federer (3-2 federer on hard). federer would be the favorite against nadal course it´s hardcourt, but if nadal brings at least his B game no one on the tour is destroying him, he´s way to strong mentaly.
|
beating federer on hard in a non major and beating federer on hard in a major are too entirely different enitities. In a major nadal has never beaten fed anywhere but the french and again he likely never will(though it is possible he could beat him at wimbledon) Federer is quite simply the best major tennis player ever and no one is particularly close.
And who was in his draw doesnt really matter if he doesnt have to play them. Speaking of draws why does tennis put 1 and 3 on the same half of the draw? every other sport puts 1 and 4.