Quote:
Originally posted by: Hitman
No, it is not debateable Spiral.
Our defense was not good enough to win, because we didn't win.
Debate. Over.
Parker's point guard play was not good enough, Duncan missed too many in the post, SA was inconsistent, and there were times the chemistry was non existent.
But.....
|
I don't understand. Is this sarcasm? By your argument, Parker's play was good enough to win, Duncan didn't miss too many in the post to win, etc. Because they won. San Antonio did nothing that wasn't good enough to win - because they won. And Detroit didn't do anything good enough to win - because they didn't win.