View Single Post
Old 01-31-2009, 08:32 PM   #52
wmbwinn
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,043
wmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud of
Default

yes, I read that article before I re-found it here.

Republicans are not opposed to the entire bill, just most of it.

1)State funding is a problem
2)real economic stimulus is ok if it makes sense. most of the bill has nothing to do with economic stimulus and is just a huge pork party
3)job production/protection which is the same thing as economic stimulus

if the bill were just about the three points above (which many/most Republicans would support), then the bill would cost forty percent of its current most minimal estimate.

The States do need funding help. That is not so much a partisan issue. Now, there may be some deep partisan divide about how to prevent that from happening again next year....
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson
wmbwinn is offline   Reply With Quote