View Single Post
Old 04-29-2013, 09:22 AM   #11
Murphy3
Guru
 
Murphy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sport
Posts: 39,422
Murphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond reputeMurphy3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Here's the biggest issue that I have.. It's not that they didn't draft some pretty good players.. it's that they constantly reached or drafted a position when comparable players at the same position would have been available a round or two later. Why take a WR in the draft when you can take some other position and get a similar WR later in the draft?
Murphy3 is offline   Reply With Quote