Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

nowitzki_prophecy · 08-18-2003, 03:41 AM

The clipps wouldn't go for Mike for Brand deal,and after this trade,we really dont need wallace.
The trade Sock proposed is most logicle,and yes,Atlanta would do this just to save money.
You know they're in a dumping salary kind of mood when they replaced Big Dog for T.Brandons contract,you Also know they're looking to Dump Ratliffs huge contract.
With mills they get an expiring contract,that for a team like the Hawks is pure gold.
With Fortson you get a player to is much more easy to move,overpaid byt he only gets 6 Mil,not Ratliffs 10 Mil,and if you pay PJ 8 Mil a year,you could find a way to throw in Fortson in a deal.
Even if he stays,he might actualy provide for a team in the east,he would be their starting 4.

08-18-2003, 03:41 AM	#12
nowitzki_prophecy Platinum Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 2,856	Mavs trade suggestion... The clipps wouldn't go for Mike for Brand deal,and after this trade,we really dont need wallace. The trade Sock proposed is most logicle,and yes,Atlanta would do this just to save money. You know they're in a dumping salary kind of mood when they replaced Big Dog for T.Brandons contract,you Also know they're looking to Dump Ratliffs huge contract. With mills they get an expiring contract,that for a team like the Hawks is pure gold. With Fortson you get a player to is much more easy to move,overpaid byt he only gets 6 Mil,not Ratliffs 10 Mil,and if you pay PJ 8 Mil a year,you could find a way to throw in Fortson in a deal. Even if he stays,he might actualy provide for a team in the east,he would be their starting 4.