Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

sefant77 · 06-30-2016, 12:12 PM

To explain it in a easy way:
We have two gigantic holes, PG and C (no, i dont want Deron back). And a young guy able to fill a roleplayer/hustler role at SF.

So im fine with going for the two missing pieces in the S5. Re-Signing Parsons means that either at PG or C the Mavs are going to have a significant downgrade.

My guess is the FO likes Conley-Wes-Anderson-Dirk-Hassan much more than Deron-Wes-Parsons-Dirk-Hassan with Deron missing his typical 30 games and Parsons with broken knees. First unit is much better balanced...

06-30-2016, 12:12 PM	#57
sefant77 Guru Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Brasil Posts: 15,401	To explain it in a easy way: We have two gigantic holes, PG and C (no, i dont want Deron back). And a young guy able to fill a roleplayer/hustler role at SF. So im fine with going for the two missing pieces in the S5. Re-Signing Parsons means that either at PG or C the Mavs are going to have a significant downgrade. My guess is the FO likes Conley-Wes-Anderson-Dirk-Hassan much more than Deron-Wes-Parsons-Dirk-Hassan with Deron missing his typical 30 games and Parsons with broken knees. First unit is much better balanced... Last edited by sefant77; 06-30-2016 at 12:12 PM.