Hmm...I"m a tad confused, is it the fact that he DIDN"T recuse himself or the assertion that he said he would that you take issue with? It sounds like the former?
I think you have a better ethical argument for voting against because you assert that he said he would recuse but didn't than that he should have. The latter seems like an arguable decision. Even if you don't agree with it are you saying he did it for financial gain?
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’
|