Quote:
Originally Posted by chumdawg
Doesn't this mean, precisely, that they didn't "deserve" the first one?
That's what I hate about the argument. It sells out the '11 team.
|
Not at all.
It means even the greatest of teams the Spurs ever had back in the day couldn't muster up enough juice to make it happen twice in a row. I don't discredit those squads or say they didn't deserve their titles at all. It's just hard ass work to get two or more in a row.