Thread: nickelodeon
View Single Post
Old 08-23-2005, 12:31 PM   #42
MavKikiNYC
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,509
MavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to beholdMavKikiNYC is a splendid one to behold
Default RE:nickelodeon

Confusing article.

Why were they testing again? Were they trying to prove that Armstrong had used drugs? Or just practicin' ?

Quote:
L'Equipe said it matched anonymous urine samples from that Tour with medical statements signed by doctors, claiming that there were "characteristic, undeniable and consequent" signs of EPO in Armstrong's urine tests.
Huh? Anonymous samples? Matched to medical statements? Signed by WHICH doctors?


BTW, Cap......what's going on with that lawsuit?
MavKikiNYC is offline   Reply With Quote