Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

dude1394 · 01-24-2005, 07:42 PM

I don't see that there is an inherent right of someone to kill another human being, no matter the situation. You can rationalize it that it's
a. not a human
b. life of the woman (both health and wealth) supercede the rights of the unborn.
c. Only a human if it's head is out of the womb, as long as the head is not out, it's still not a human.
d. Not a human until it's 1-2 years old.
e. Justified for some reason x.

There are many ways of rationalizing it and obviously legalizing it, but it's just as easy to argue the other side of the fetus's rights to not be torn limb from limb.

01-24-2005, 07:42 PM	#18
dude1394 Guru Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 40,410	RE: Bush Against Womens Rights I don't see that there is an inherent right of someone to kill another human being, no matter the situation. You can rationalize it that it's a. not a human b. life of the woman (both health and wealth) supercede the rights of the unborn. c. Only a human if it's head is out of the womb, as long as the head is not out, it's still not a human. d. Not a human until it's 1-2 years old. e. Justified for some reason x. There are many ways of rationalizing it and obviously legalizing it, but it's just as easy to argue the other side of the fetus's rights to not be torn limb from limb. __________________ "Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’