View Single Post
Old 02-07-2005, 08:51 PM   #5
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default RE:More bad news for liberals....Mideast Peace?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Drbio
Quote:
Originally posted by: madape
I'm sure the liberals are fuming at the idea of peace in the middle east.

The only peace that counts, you see, is peace that is fostered by Democratics.
Exactly ape. Another of their red herrings has fallen. Bush's administration has kicked the dimocraps in the groin yet again.
and, after the heaping of all the credit onto the lap of Rice, you now have the deal all completed and peace is breaking out. As we have seen in the past, a summit does not a peace agreement make, and a peace agreement does not a true state of peace make. There's a long road yet to travel.

Quote:
And if anyone wants to see how a dim/lib spins it where Condi/Bush gets no credit, see the blank void above ape's post.
no spin needed. facts are facts, the summit timing has more to do with Arafat's death, the PLA elections, Sharon forming a coalition with Labour, than anything remotely resembling "credit" for "Condi/Bush".

of course, it's telling about people's perspective when they take a positive step to finding peace (such as an Israeli/PLA meeting) and try and make it a partisan issue.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote