View Single Post
Old 09-24-2009, 03:12 PM   #59
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude1394 View Post
However this Acorn office WAS helping bringing underage girls (per the pimp 13years old) into the states as sex slaves....abut still you defend them. And other acorn offices have helped pimps/prostitutes that are also underage however you have defended acorn on this from day one with your own unique style.

I think some serious soul-searching is in order.
yes, you should do some "soul searching" on how you twist what has been done.

these two people go into an acorn office, and find a sleasy person and secretly film him respond to their questions.

any honest person would have thrown these fimmakers out, but it should come as no surprise that there are corrupt, sleasy people in this world. do you indict a whole office and group of people based on this one person? if someone in your company commits a rape are we to believe that everybody in your company ais a rapist, too?

as for "helping bringing underage girls", the filmmaker states "the girls are coming this weekend...". the person is not transport ingthese girls, he is not involved in their movement, he is told the girls are coming and what is his advise on how to get them across the border.

what "other acorn offices have helped pimps/prostitutes that are also underage"? these videos from baltimore and new york are not guilty of that charge. care to explain yourself?

there's no defending the fact this sleaseball should have thrown the two people out of his office (as was done in multiple acorn offices when the filmmakers tried the same trap).

so no, there is no defense for the people who didn't tell these posers to leave once they heard about the girls. they were wrong, should not be employed there, and are just bad people.

there should be an accurate telling of the story however, and to say that "acorn was helping bring underage girls into the states as sex slaves" is about as inaccurate as it gets. this sleaseball, who was working for acorn, was stupid enough to answer the question these filmmakers posed on his opinion of how to get them across the border.

you're wrong, and you know it.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote