Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

Nellie · 07-16-2002, 03:57 PM

I have to agree. If we take on Blaylock, we would have not 1 but 2 older PGs at the end of their careers. Blaylock is no better of an option than AJ so why would we want that? Sura is an inconsistent player, often hurt and would never be a better option than Griffin. That leaves Dampier who I actualy think could help the Mavs but not forthe price of NVE. If you could get a Bradley for Dampier deal done, than I would be on board with that. But other than that, this trade makes absolutely no sense at all.

Regardless, welcome to the board.

07-16-2002, 03:57 PM	#7
Nellie Golden Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,017	I have to agree. If we take on Blaylock, we would have not 1 but 2 older PGs at the end of their careers. Blaylock is no better of an option than AJ so why would we want that? Sura is an inconsistent player, often hurt and would never be a better option than Griffin. That leaves Dampier who I actualy think could help the Mavs but not forthe price of NVE. If you could get a Bradley for Dampier deal done, than I would be on board with that. But other than that, this trade makes absolutely no sense at all. Regardless, welcome to the board. __________________ Damn that Steve Kerr!