View Single Post
Old 04-18-2016, 10:37 PM   #8
BPo001
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,199
BPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond reputeBPo001 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky View Post
I'd probably define superteam differently.

Definition A) Any team who stacked the deck with two or more stars a la Miami

Definition B) Any team who just put together a dominant team through drafting, free agency, and good development.

I like a good superteam like definition B. Dynasties make other teams hungry and make for good TV. Players stacking the deck to buy their own championships? Less so.
What about a team like the '08 Celtics who traded for their big 3? It's hard not to like a team like definition B. To draft and develop your own players is how it should be done.
BPo001 is offline   Reply With Quote