Thread: Kyle Lowry
View Single Post
Old 01-29-2013, 08:45 AM   #8
spreedom
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 3,938
spreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac222b View Post
Would rather see them continue to develop Darren and Roddy over giving up valuable assets for Lowry.
Wow. Some people are never going to let go of that 40 point game, are they? Roddy is not an NBA caliber player. He's actually regressed in almost every way since his rookie season.

Quote:
There is a reason Calderon is playing over him. Carlisle would likely have some of the same issues with Lowry that he does with our current crop of "point guards".
Yeah, Calderon is a better fit with the starting lineup and is immeasurably better as a starter than he is when coming off the bench. It's just Toronto managing their assets. Calderon would be starting here over any of our point guards too. It doesn't mean Lowry isn't better than them too.

Last edited by spreedom; 01-29-2013 at 08:49 AM.
spreedom is offline   Reply With Quote