View Single Post
Old 03-08-2005, 06:29 PM   #23
dude1394
Guru
 
dude1394's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 40,410
dude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond reputedude1394 has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:The evil plan of republicans for social security

Quote:
Originally posted by: Mavdog
Two questions actually.

The first was should everybody have access to a 401 account? I believe they do, either thru employer run (401k) or individual (IRAs) tax deferred accounts. The concept of the medical accounts Bush spoke of also seem to have some future value retained in the unspent monies, but that's not going to help these poorer folk...

As for the second, should poor people be forced to participate in the SS, with a personal savings rate for the US close to zero I would argue the state run program is better.
"Possibly" everyone may have access to a 401K account. However everyone does not have excess dollars to put in that account. However there is a forced taxation that is enforced on those people as well as their employers that is 12% of their income.

The question stands, should not those people have the opportunity to invest that taxable income into a 401K account that they will own versus being beholden to the government for their retirement.
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’
dude1394 is offline   Reply With Quote