Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

Zki41 · 02-03-2009, 02:59 PM

Jamaal Tinsley for Stackhouse or George? Both the Pacers and Dallas have nothing to lose, except for maybe Stackhouse's expiring. Tinsley isn't playing at all, and can easily give of us some points off the bench as well as give JJB some room at SG similar to those few games were JJB was not playing point, and scored 15 - 20 points a night. I'm not sure Indiana would have a use for either Stackhouse or George.

There is also the fact that Oklahoma was interested in trading Watson for Carrol, which would the alleviate the need for this trade - but it wouldn't hurt either.

02-03-2009, 02:59 PM	#1
Zki41 Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 624	Jamaal Tinsley Jamaal Tinsley for Stackhouse or George? Both the Pacers and Dallas have nothing to lose, except for maybe Stackhouse's expiring. Tinsley isn't playing at all, and can easily give of us some points off the bench as well as give JJB some room at SG similar to those few games were JJB was not playing point, and scored 15 - 20 points a night. I'm not sure Indiana would have a use for either Stackhouse or George. There is also the fact that Oklahoma was interested in trading Watson for Carrol, which would the alleviate the need for this trade - but it wouldn't hurt either.