Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

Dooby · 07-17-2003, 08:53 AM

I support this decision 100%. For the same reasons, I would have understood if 'Zo couldn't play and the Mavs were denied a medical exception. If the guy has missed the better part of THREE SEASONS, the team isn't entitled to a medical exception. The team has known forever that Hill was doubtful. At the time they applied, they still had their exceptions. They chose to spend it on Juwan Howard. At some point, the league needs to just look at the team and say, "So you think Grant Hill might not play this year? Well, duh!"

07-17-2003, 08:53 AM	#4
Dooby Diamond Member Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 5,832	No exception for Grant Hill I support this decision 100%. For the same reasons, I would have understood if 'Zo couldn't play and the Mavs were denied a medical exception. If the guy has missed the better part of THREE SEASONS, the team isn't entitled to a medical exception. The team has known forever that Hill was doubtful. At the time they applied, they still had their exceptions. They chose to spend it on Juwan Howard. At some point, the league needs to just look at the team and say, "So you think Grant Hill might not play this year? Well, duh!" __________________ At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. A fool's paradise is a wise man's hell. – Thomas Fuller