Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

grndmstr_c · 11-11-2009, 01:06 PM

I see two potential benefits of keeping Damp's minutes in a range that makes 2100 in 70 achievable...for the time being, at least: 1) major incentive to Damp to keep producing, 2) major incentive for Mark/Donnie to execute a trade for Camby or the like.

And my not-so-bad, worst-case-but-not-really scenario: Damp gets his 2100 in 70, gets the extra year on his contract to kick in, and the Mavs get two straight years of contract Damp.

11-11-2009, 01:06 PM	#10
grndmstr_c Diamond Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 7,938	I see two potential benefits of keeping Damp's minutes in a range that makes 2100 in 70 achievable...for the time being, at least: 1) major incentive to Damp to keep producing, 2) major incentive for Mark/Donnie to execute a trade for Camby or the like. And my not-so-bad, worst-case-but-not-really scenario: Damp gets his 2100 in 70, gets the extra year on his contract to kick in, and the Mavs get two straight years of contract Damp. __________________ "He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in." -Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.