View Single Post
Old 05-15-2018, 09:40 PM   #95
Underdog
Moderator
 
Underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
Underdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BPo001 View Post
For max money? I think I'd pass. Too similar to Barnes IMO.
How so? They might be the same height, but Parker is built more like a PF than Barnes -- he's bulkier, which makes him better-suited to bang in the paint. He's also a better rebounder, and flashes more upside as a scorer. At worst, he'd be a good Barnes replacement in a couple years, but I think they'd work well together in the modern NBA.

I still like Gordon better, but Parker might actually cost less than max with his injury history -- if nothing else I don't think the Bucks match.
__________________

These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Underdog is offline   Reply With Quote