View Single Post
Old 04-15-2004, 12:41 PM   #13
FishForLunch
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,011
FishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of lightFishForLunch is a glorious beacon of light
Default RE:Fun with Statistics

Quote:
ot quite sure what you're saying here, it certainly is not "Ted Kennedy and JFKerry" who are pushing for the quick handoff but the Bush WH. They didn't cause an "uproar" either, for it is clear that the Iraqis are NOT ready, the systems of goverance are NOT ready, and without the legitimacy that an elected (rather than appointed) government gets the probability for its success is limited. Why the rush? Answer: Fall elections, and the ability of GWBush to make the claim that Iraq is making progress in its new government.
No "Ted Kennedy and JFKerry" are the ones that are rejoicing that the Iraqi situation is proving difficult and want Bush to extend the handover so they can bash him more untill the November election. You say the Iraqis are not ready but they will be when they have control, the US army will be there to help them.

You may trust the UN but I sure dont trust those corrupt people who screwed the Iraqi people in the Oil for Food program.

So you think Russsia and France would ever joined the coalition when they had businees ties with Saddam. I dont belive that.
FishForLunch is offline   Reply With Quote