Quote:
Originally Posted by alexamenos
She made some statement somewhere along the way that weren't unmistakeably eugenic, therefore she really wasn't a eugencist. This is your argument?
|
no, not at all, the point being the work done earlier had no eugenic ideals in them.
you seem to believe that somewhere I've said she wasn't a eugenist, which is not the case in her later years.
and clearly your argument is that due to sanger (and quite a few of the people in the 1920s) embracing eugenics later in life, all their work decades earlier must have been based on that philosophy.
retroactive thought? that's a new concept.